By Metaview

Metaview

What it does

Metaview is a recruiting platform spanning candidate sourcing, inbound application review, screening, interview notes and reporting. Its agents support different stages of a hiring process; the interview Notetaker can also be considered on its own. A team should choose the actual workflow and plan it needs rather than assume every agent is included.

The useful path is concrete: define role criteria, review AI-assisted application sorting, capture consenting interviews, inspect the generated notes and scorecards, then make hiring decisions as people. Metaview describes the AI output as evidence and assistance; the recruiter still owns the decision.

Category
Recruiting
Last updated
Oct 26, 2026
Metaview · Editorial illustration
Editorial illustration of blank application cards sorted by criteria beside an interview microphone and review notes.

Work at Metaview?

Help customers find accurate information about your software.

Manage this listing →

Find your fit

Who it is for

A recruiting team with many interviews can use Notetaker to create a shared record and prepare scorecards, especially when interviewer notes are inconsistent or late. The team still needs time to read the draft, rate competencies and submit the final feedback.

A team with a large inbound queue can define an Ideal Candidate Profile, review the criteria before processing applicants and inspect fit reasons, including candidates near the bottom of the ranking. This is more useful when recruiters treat the buckets as prompts for review rather than automatic exclusion.

For proactive search, Sourcing can work from a job description, example resume or intake discussion. Plan separately for candidate-contact policy, human calibration and the commercial scope of this agent.

Back to sections

The work it supports

Core capabilities

Notetaker captures hiring conversations from video, phone or in-person meetings and turns captured material into notes. Establish which meeting formats and recording method fit the organization before rolling it out.

The captured conversation can produce a transcript, structured notes and a draft scorecard. Interviewers should verify specific candidate examples, add their own ratings and recommendation, and record any competency the conversation did not test.

Teams can choose reusable note templates and bring in role descriptions, resumes, prior notes and ATS context. Those inputs can make a summary more relevant, but the generated narrative should be checked against the source conversation.

Candidate summaries can combine several conversations so a recruiter or hiring manager sees the sequence of interviews in one place. Keep access limited to the people who need that candidate record.

ATS handoff varies: Metaview describes scorecard submission from its product for Ashby and Lever, while Greenhouse uses an extension to fill objective sections and asks the interviewer to finish subjective fields and submit there. Test the exact field mapping and permissions in the chosen ATS.

The newer desktop option can record without a bot appearing as another meeting participant. That changes the capture method, not the team’s duty to notify the candidate and respect a refusal.

For inbound applications, the system can draft an Ideal Candidate Profile from a job post and added context. A person reviews, edits and approves those criteria before the agent scores applicants against them.

The application agent sorts applicants into fit buckets and shows the reasons behind each placement. Review some low-ranked examples and correct criteria that misread relevant experience; a sorted queue can still hide candidates if nobody looks beyond its top.

Metaview says the application agent never auto-rejects. Recruiters still decide whom to advance or pass, using the applicant’s evidence and the team’s approved criteria rather than accepting a score as a verdict.

Sourcing can interpret requirements supplied through voice, free text, a job description, sample resumes or intake context to search for potential candidates. Treat the output as a shortlist to calibrate and check, and decide separately how outreach will be conducted.

Reports can query themes and process measures across interviews that were captured in Metaview. The results describe the team’s own recorded pipeline, so avoid reading them as a complete picture of the outside labor market.

The integration directory spans applicant tracking, video, calendar and SSO tools. Check the exact connector, data fields, sync direction and access rights needed for the intended workflow.

Back to sections

Understand the offer

Pricing and getting started

The public Notetaker Free plan is listed at $0 per user monthly for 25 calls each month and basic transcription. This entry point should not be read as free access to all sourcing or application-review agents.

The public Notetaker Pro plan is listed at $60 per user monthly, with unlimited calls and priority processing. Confirm the current currency, billing interval, retention and seat requirements with Metaview before purchase.

Notetaker Enterprise uses tailored pricing. The complete Agentic Recruiting Platform with all agents is separately presented with custom sales pricing; ask which agent, volume and integration rights the quote covers.

Back to sections

Look a little closer

Before you choose

Before recording, tell candidates what will be captured and how they can decline. Set access, retention and response paths for copy or deletion requests; use manual notes when a candidate opts out. The team should check applicable rules for its locations.

Pilot with fictional role criteria and sample applications: inspect both high and low fit buckets, read the explanations, revise an overly narrow criterion and confirm that a person makes the advance or pass call.

For an interview pilot, check recording consent, note accuracy, candidate summaries and scorecard edits before any ATS submission. Follow the specific ATS path rather than assuming every connector writes decisions in the same way.

Get a quote for the actual mix of agents. The public $0 and $60 per-user figures apply to the Notetaker plans shown on the pricing page; the broader platform is custom priced.

Back to sections

10 distinct sources behind this profile. Research observed Oct 26, 2026. Features and offers can change.
View sources and research →

Help keep this profile useful

Spotted an outdated detail? Send the correction with a supporting source. A verified account is needed to submit.

Suggest a correction ↗