By Greenhouse

Greenhouse

What it does

Greenhouse is a recruiting system for teams that need to move a candidate from discovery and application through review, interviews and an offer. Its applicant tracking workflow connects the people involved in hiring around one process, with sourcing, structured evaluation, scheduling and reporting around the candidate record.

Category
Recruiting
Last updated
Oct 18, 2026
Greenhouse · Editorial illustration
Original conceptual editorial illustration of candidate files moving through structured evaluation cards toward an offer envelope. Not a Greenhouse screenshot.

Work at Greenhouse?

Help customers find accurate information about your software.

Manage this listing →

Find your fit

Who it is for

It suits an organization where recruiters and hiring managers share openings, interview responsibilities and approval steps. A smaller team might use it to replace manual coordination; a growing team can examine whether its process, permissions and reporting needs justify the higher tiers. Compare a representative real hiring pipeline with the plan and implementation quote rather than assuming every advertised capability is included.

Teams doing proactive talent outreach can create prospects and prospect pools before an application arrives. Teams that mainly receive inbound applicants can start with application review and filters, then move shortlisted candidates through a defined interview plan. This is a recruiting workflow; Greenhouse presents Onboarding on a separate product page.

Back to sections

The work it supports

Core capabilities

At the front of the pipeline, Greenhouse lists sourcing and CRM alongside prospect creation and pools. The plan comparison also lists application review and filters. Check how your recruiters add, segment and revisit prospects and how incoming applications are sorted for a real role.

Before interviews, hiring teams can set role criteria and build an organized plan with prep kits and candidate scorecards. The point of the structure is that interviewers assess the same role requirements and record feedback in a consistent place. A pilot should use one actual job and its current scorecard, then compare what interviewers can see and submit.

Greenhouse describes candidate self-scheduling, scheduling links and reminders. This can reduce the manual work of coordinating interview times, but it is worth testing a real multi-interviewer sequence with calendar availability, rescheduling and the candidate-facing messages.

Job and offer approvals appear in the plan comparison. The interviewing page also describes automated or custom next-step communication and rejection email templates. Check who can approve each stage and how candidate messages are reviewed before sending, particularly when several departments share the same hiring system.

Reporting covers prebuilt dashboards and custom reporting options. Ask the vendor to show the measures your team actually uses, such as stage movement and interview completion, and confirm whether the required report, export or business intelligence connection is in the quoted tier.

Greenhouse describes prebuilt integrations and an open API. Its API page includes candidate updates and application stage actions. For a specific HRIS, job board or assessment provider, verify the named connection, supported data, permissions and any implementation work rather than treating an integration listing as a completed workflow.

AI Notetaker is described as transcribing video interviews and drafting notes around scorecard questions. If using it, test consent, who can access recordings, note review and retention against your organization’s hiring policy.

Back to sections

Understand the offer

Pricing and getting started

The current public plan page lists Core, Plus and Pro and asks buyers to get a demo. It does not state a fixed price in the captured page, so budget from a written quote that specifies seats or hiring volume, term, implementation, support and any add-ons.

Core lists sourcing and CRM, structured interview kits and scorecards, AI Notetaker, scheduling, reporting, SSO and Talent Matching. Plus is described as including Core and adding AI report filters, a BI connector, sourcing automation, texting and fraud or spam detection. Check the exact entitlements in the proposed contract.

Pro is described as including Plus and adding enterprise data configuration and security, an audit log and developer sandbox and sync. Those controls may matter in a multi-region or highly governed rollout; obtain a demonstration and written scope before relying on them.

Back to sections

Look a little closer

Before you choose

For a trial or sales demonstration, take one genuine requisition through approvals, a few sample applications, interview scheduling, completed scorecards and an offer decision. Include a recruiter, interviewer and hiring manager so permissions and handoffs can be observed. Then export the report you would use to review the pipeline.

If handoff after offer acceptance matters, assess Greenhouse Onboarding separately: its own page describes syncing new-hire information from Greenhouse Recruiting to Onboarding and an HRIS. Confirm product inclusion and the fields that transfer. This research used public vendor pages only; it did not operate an account, test an integration or verify a quote.

Back to sections

7 distinct sources behind this profile. Research observed Oct 18, 2026. Features and offers can change.
View sources and research →

Help keep this profile useful

Spotted an outdated detail? Send the correction with a supporting source. A verified account is needed to submit.

Suggest a correction ↗